tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28715994.comments2008-09-28T16:06:06.067+08:00theirmindhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14008920659484771670theirmind@gmail.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28715994.post-11981092838051830962008-09-28T16:06:06.067+08:002008-09-28T16:06:06.067+08:00話是如此,但是還是有可能性!theirmindhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14008920659484771670noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28715994.post-49299312383681963122008-09-26T17:27:36.202+08:002008-09-26T17:27:36.202+08:00可是那研究不就變成不具研究性的東西 ?<BR/>我是指以假設來為出發點Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28715994.post-35666230768313047282008-09-26T14:38:40.349+08:002008-09-26T14:38:40.349+08:00在設立假設前,人們早就有答案,只是那關是肯定或是否定的!不能把衣服為褲子,都是假設罷了!我的意思是說人的idea只是假設點,並非正確的!也就是自己造意!theirmindhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14008920659484771670noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28715994.post-85704996149199425472008-09-24T13:49:05.498+08:002008-09-24T13:49:05.498+08:00我有個問題<BR/>若內容都是以假設性成立<BR/>那答案的產生也就是假設的產生<BR/>那被質疑的程度就很高<BR/><BR/>這樣說好了<BR/>就像今天說<BR/>假如你會把衣服變成褲子<BR/>之後以此為基點推出答案<BR/>但實際上這個"你"並沒有辦法把衣服變成褲子<BR/>而卻要像回答報告一般做出種種假設<BR/>並思考出結論<BR/>這樣我不大懂這個結論的用途?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28715994.post-6828151475638565812008-05-18T00:24:38.291+08:002008-05-18T00:24:38.291+08:00我很喜歡你的內容,請繼續加油!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28715994.post-76435334300681466552007-01-01T22:08:21.465+08:002007-01-01T22:08:21.465+08:00我來看嚕~我是孟庭,你說ㄉ也是ㄝ~<br />貞不知道是在高興什ㄇ??哈哈Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com